There is Life After Death According to Quantum Physics

16
life after death
Maskalin | Shutterstock.com

According to Biocentrism, death is not the end of the journey, but « a » journey.

Life goes on in a parallel universe regardless of what happens to it in this one.

“Now he has departed from this strange world a little ahead of me.” Wrote Einstein in a condolence letter upon the death of his close friend, Michele Besso, in 1955. “That signifies nothing. For those of us who believe in physics, the distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.”

According to 'Biocentrism', life doesn't end and death is just an illusion.Click To Tweet

Einstein died merely a month after he wrote the letter and, apparently, he was right, as new scientific theories suggest that death, just like life, is but an illusion.

Quantum physics laws tells us that “life” is not made of matter but of vibrations that escape time and space.

Biocentrism, the Theory of Everything (?)

What happens when we die? Where does the human conscience come from? Does the brain perceive or create (then perceive) what we call reality? If consciousness doesn’t originate from the brain, then the presence of physical envelopes isn’t crucial for it to exist.

“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness.” Said Max Planck, Nobel Prize-winning physicist, “We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”

Biocentrism builds on that and goes on to suggest that consciousness creates the universe or reality, that time and space are mere illusions, manifestations in our minds, and that reality is determined by the observer.

Biocentrism and Relativity predict the same phenomena, but biocentrism, according to its fans, is superior because it does not need to imagine an extra dimension or new mathematics to be formulated.

Biocentrism claims that life is immortal and that it’s at the center of existence, reality, and the cosmos. By adding life and consciousness to the equation, biocentrism is believed by its adepts to be the theory of everything.

Life & Death According to Robert Lanza

Robert Lanza is a highly qualified scientist and a priori a very serious person. He’s specialized in stem cells, cloning, and regenerative medicine research. Lanza has a distinguished career with articles devoted to him in prestigious publications.

In 2014, he made the Time Magazine’s list of the 100 most influential people in the world, and in 2015, Prospect Magazine selected him as one of the “World’s Thinkers 2015”.

In 2009, Lanza published his book “BIOCENTRISM: How Life and Consciousness are the Keys to Understanding the True Nature of the Universe” in which he places biology above other sciences and calls for a switch from physics to biology to understand “everything”.

Dr. Lanza says that he thinks he is succeeding in the unification that Einstein would have failed to achieve, claiming that Einstein only considered reality from the physical side, without giving much thought to biology.

Lanza claims that quantum physics has proved the existence of life after death, that energy is immortal, and so is life.

For Lanza, we believe in death because we have been taught that we are dying, however, biocentrism says the universe exists only because the individual is aware of it.

Life and biology create this reality, and the universe itself does not create life. The concepts of time and space, according to Lanza, are simply tools of our imagination.

Last year, Lanza, along with astronomer Bob Berman, revisited his controversial theory in a new book, Beyond Biocentrism.

OK, Dr. Lanza may sound more like Nietzsche than Einstein, but what’s your take on this?

banner ad to seo services page

16 COMMENTS

    • Thanks for taking the time to read our blog. As the Chief Editor of Edgy Labs, I want to make sure that we cover topics that are interesting, informative and engaging to our readers. What specifically did you find offensive about this post? Thanks for letting us know and for helping us improve our site. Thank you again for visiting!

  1. He has some good points…..but they are interpretations not in any way proofs…. consciousness could be a higher reality of sorts but that in no way means reality is an illusion , quit the contrary , observation and experimentation prove it is not an illusion. Now it is perfectly reasonable to say consciousness is a higher reality yet….but quantum mechanics does not prove that. Quantum mechanics ties consciousness to free will …and says if you don’t believe in free will then you don’t need to worry about quantum mechanics. …people trade the word observation for MEASUREMENT . whether or not you observe it has nothing to do with it …it’s a measurement that determines the wave particle duality determination. If you don’t have free will then someone could make the case the universe conspired to make the decision for you and there is no duality problem. If you believe in free will then quantum mechanics works just fine but it uses measurement not observation to settle the issue of what is being measured.

    • What about Wheeler’s Delayed Choice? (See ANU for a recent demonstration.) These experiments suggest that wave function collapse does not occur if the stored measurement of the measuring device is irrevocably destroyed before being looked at. It’s super weird, super sound (and clever) methodology, and at that moment, completely without explanation.

  2. My apologies to be blunt; there is no such thing as ^freewill^. That based-on-superficial-observation concept is even an issue to begin with, because it works –& therefore is needed–to “market” the doctrine of sin & consequently the “sales” of heavenly lands (for the political gain of mass control by the communism-teaching-&-preaching class of priests & imams).

    Logico-scientific proofs debunking the existence of ^freewill^ can be studied in the books The Myth of Choice by Kent Greenfield, & Free Will by Sam Harris. Even religions themselves “secretly” admit that “freewill” is non-sense –if you know where to look for the almost-never-quoted verses:

    While the God of Islamism admits (despite contradicting other verses Muslim writers often cherry-pick in their Taqiyya-based presentations) the non-existence of ^freewill^ (where everything has been predestined for It to be infinitely-almighty above & for everything there was, is & will be), the God of Judeo-Christianism cowardly boggles in semantics & word games to avoid being linked to evil. Look at how It tries to present an “alternative fact” in Romans8:28. In Islamism, Allah ^told^ the Prophet that Adam had been predestined to eat that fruit 40 years before he was even created (Sahih Muslim Book 33#6409; see also Book 33#6241 pertaining to every man’s share of adultery) & the death of an underage boy killed as a casualty of war shouldn’t be mourned because “like his parents, he would’ve grown up to be another infidel anyway” (Muslim 33#6434 linked to Quran18:73, & a similar Biblical story of God’s hatred to Esau before he was even born, in Malachi1:3 & Romans9:13).

    To see above & beyond the duality & conditionalism that is God and Satan (Iblis), there’s a book of consistent logic in explaining ^freewill^. Unlike the many dozens of religious scriptures & New Age readings attempting to smokescreen the ultimately-existential Q of freewill & predestination –or even avoiding the very mention of it altogether– the presentation simply claim there is no ^freewill^ because “in the higher dimensions, the future has already happened”. This is NOT a science book & can be safely recommended as a pastime fiction reading (though we’d never know what science can possibly attain & consequently prove in the distant future:-). Find it in Our Universal Journey by George Kavassilas. Happy finding your own truth!

      • Indeed, “freewill” is scientifically a non-issue (why even mentioning it if one did not believe that it is 1.Given to them by Yahweh/Elohim or Allah 2. With the purpose of testing their one-time-only worth of receiving a piece of land in heaven?) whereas science has “retro-causality” (a completely different concept, being totally incompatible with “who’s giving it?” & “what’s the purpose of having it?”) in explaining certain particulars found evolutionary biology and quantum mechanics.

        Yet outside of science, “freewill” is still a hot, popular tool in religious teachings & preachings. Were we already predestined by God to do –or not to do– what we “believe” we had chosen to do –or not do? The verses quoted above show that religions’ answer for this will flip-flop as political convenience demands, LOL. In fact all religions & spiritualities claiming that God exists as 1 personal entity are struggling to smokescreen (the implications from) this question due to its logical potential of destroying adherents’ faith –except for Buddhism which was highly praised by Einstein himself, as quoted in the book Albert Einstein the Human Side. Or is the one doing the predestinating is our (own) upper-dimensional higher selves (as Kavassilas consistently claim in his presentation)?

  3. What we call “physics” is really microbiology -& MACRO TOO- all along already. MOTION is ENERGY & energy is “LIFE” -yes biologically actually…..!

  4. More narcissistic tree falls in forest does it make a sound nonsense. Yes, no shit. Whether or not someone is there to hear it. It made a sound. The idea that something exists only when it’s perceived can only make sense to the most vain narcissistic individual in the world. You sincerely have to be truly self centered to think the world vanishes when you close the door on it.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here